Rabbi Shmuley Speaks to Marianne Williamson about her presidential campaign.

Former Democrat presidential hopeful Marianne Williamson joined Rabbi Shmuley Boteach for a Facebook Live discussion on Tuesday in which she claimed leaders within the Democrat Party and the “media industrial-complex” conspired with one another in an effort to make her look crazy.

Read the rest of the story on Breitbart.



Less than six months into his job as US President Donald Trump’s adviser on international negotiations and chief Middle East negotiator, Jason Greenblatt is already feeling heat.

Following his trips to the Middle East in both March and May, some in the pro-Israel community have already begun accusing the chief negotiator of coming under the influence of left-leaning, wing-tipped bureaucrats at the State Department.

They point to Greenblatt’s meetings with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who they believe (as do I) is not a true partner for peace. They take issue with Trump’s failure to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem. They question Greenblatt’s relationship with Tzipi Livni and Ronald Lauder. And they intimate he is slowly falling for a decades-old European campaign for a two-state solution.

The criticisms don’t stop at policy. In the Israeli press, some even criticized Jason for not wearing a kippa. Even Reuters mentioned it last March.

But I know Jason. And it bothers me to see a good man defamed.

So here are the facts: On the kippa issue, there has already been way too much frum-shaming aimed at members of the Trump administration. It is downright disgusting. I am a proud Jew and believe in external manifestations of Jewishness.

But the constant attempts to humiliate Jared and Ivanka about travel on Shabbat, and now Jason about a kippa, subverts basic norms of Jewish decency and punishes those in the administration who are observant. Rather than being proud of their orthodoxy, we seek to prove their hypocrisy.

The Mishna in Ethics of our Fathers is clear: judge everyone favorably. Shame on us that we don’t.

Jason Greenblatt is a devout and observant Jew. Whether he wears a kippa is not the public’s business. Plenty of other generally kippa-clad Orthodox Jews opted not to wear them while serving in their official capacities – among them former US ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer, Obama’s secretary of the treasury Jack Lew, or even the famously Orthodox Senator Joe Lieberman. While I absolutely believe in wearing a kippa, sitting with a magnifying glass to examine who does and doesn’t wear one is the condescension of the self-commissioned purity police for whom faith is naught but a game of never-ending condemnation. We don’t live in Iran. So let’s stop this disgusting display of judgment.

I consider Greenblatt a friend and saw him recently in the White House again to talk about Israel. He is a good and God-fearing person, a man of genuine humility with a deep moral center. And he is dedicated in heart, body and soul to America, his Jewishness, and Israel.

His critics have told only one side of the story. Here is a figure at the center of Middle East policy in an administration that has preached to the Arab states that they must finally stop all funding of terrorism, that has forcefully challenged UN bias against Israel, that is working to contain and isolate genocidal Iran, that put Israel on the president’s first trip abroad, that had the president make the first ever visit by the leader of the free world to the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest site, that has reversed the non-stop hostility shown by the Obama administration to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and that celebrated Israel’s Independence Day with the US vice president at the first ever White House celebration.

And let us not forget that the Trump administration demonstrated morality and humanity in attacking the air force of Syrian mass murderer Bashar Assad after Assad gassed innocent Arab children, something president Obama categorically refused to do.

And for all that, Greenblatt, who is helping to shape all these policies, is being attacked for not doing more.

Mind you, I believe he could do more, that he should do more. I believe the administration should be telling Abbas that there will be no negotiations until the PA immediately ceases all payments to terrorists and their families. I believe that a Palestinian state would quickly be overtaken by Hamas and would pose an existential threat to Israel.

And I believe that the Trump administration has a moral obligation to bomb the recently- revealed Syrian crematoria where tens of thousands of bodies have already been burned.

Those are incredibly serious issues, ones which I hope Greenblatt will carefully consider before moving forward.

But for all of that, the Trump administration has thus far shown incredible friendship to Israel, and Greenblatt, Jared Kushner and David Friedman, along, of course, with the president, deserve enormous credit.

Jason Greenblatt has played a pivotal role in reversing the previous administration’s hostility toward Israel. He is a hero for doing so and deserves our thanks.

When it comes to Middle East policy, particularly in how it pertains to Israel, the Trump administration has not been perfect.

Neither was the administration of George W. Bush, who was the best friend Israel ever had in the Oval Office prior to Trump. The Trump administration could have moved the embassy, and still should. Many in the administration, including Trump himself, still seem to believe that the two-state solution can bring peace.

But what they haven’t done is peddle the deeply-flawed policies of the Obama State Department. On the contrary, Greenblatt and all those in the Trump administration’s foreign policy wing have taken huge steps to perfect American policy in the Middle East, make it clear to American allies that there will be no tolerance for terrorist sympathy or funding, and that demonizing Israel will make you anathema to America.

The best proof came last week.

For years under the Obama administration, Qatar was allowed to freely fund some of the most brutal terrorists in the Middle East, including and especially Israel’s arch-enemy Hamas, the leader of which Qatar hosted for over a decade and to whom it promised a billion dollars in 2014. Housing America’s largest air base in the Middle East, they seemed to always get a pass from their American tenants.

Until now.

Following Trump’s meeting with the Saudi king in Riyadh last month, however, Qatar’s neighbors finally had the American support they needed to take action and rein in the evil kingdom.

And indeed, just last week, the sheiks of Qatar were finally made to pay for the incalculable cash flows they’ve been providing to terrorists across the Middle East and to the thugs in Iran. Following their payment of a billion-dollar ransom to Iran, Qatar found itself cut off both diplomatically and physically from almost of all of its most crucial allies, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt. Saudi Arabia even locked its borders with Qatar, preventing the import of 40% of the nation’s food, making prices soar. Qatar’s state-sponsored news outlet, known for its bitter hostility to Israel, suffered crippling cyber-attacks and was forced to shut down its website.

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir made it pretty simple. For Qatar to win over its friends again, all it needed to do was cut ties with Islamist terrorist groups Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Finally, someone said it. This would in all likelihood not have occurred without the Trump administration.

President Trump took credit for the actions taken against Qatar, tweeting that his trip to the Middle East was “already paying off.”

And the truth is, while these moves were taken by Arab states, they could not have happened without a presidential go-ahead, which explains why they happened only now.

This wasn’t the first time Trump took Middle Eastern nations to task for their support of terrorism. He did the same with Iran, against whom he’s taken a long-awaited hard line, a U-turn from Obama’s generous nuclear deal, which gave the terrorist state $150 billion, the legitimization of their nuclear program, and the right to build nuclear bombs legitimately in just over a decade.

In the UN, too, Ambassador Nikki Haley has completely reversed the decline of American support for Israel at the UN. Last week she called out the UN Human Rights Council, which she claimed “whitewashes brutality” and reserves its criticism exclusively for the State of Israel. She even threatened to pull American funding for the Geneva- based body. On Wednesday, while on a trip to Israel, Haley told President Reuven Rivlin: “I have never taken kindly to bullies and the UN has bullied Israel for a very long time and we are not going to let that happen anymore.” It’s clearly a new day for Israel at the UN.

I have been honest to Greenblatt about my disagreements with administration policy.

But for the enormous progress he and his team have already made, they deserve credit, our thanks, and our patience.

The author, “America’s rabbi,” whom The Washington Post calls “the most famous rabbi in America,” is the international bestselling author of 30 books including his most recent The Israel Warrior. Follow him on Twitter @ RabbiShmuley.


For the Love of G-d, Bomb the Syrian Crematorium Now

Just days ago, right outside the Israeli Knesset in Jerusalem, there was a protest calling on Israel to ‘Save Syria’.


No Holds Barred: The last Kaddish for Elie Wiesel

Reb Eliezer dedicated his life to commemorating the victims of mankind’s greatest crime, ensuring that it never be lost to the public consciousness.

Before the serious policy disagreements on the Iran nuclear agreement and the inaction in Syria that would come between me and Samantha Power, America’s former ambassador to the UN, I remember studying with her at the White House the words of last week’s Torah reading in Leviticus 19: “Thou shalt not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor.”

This biblical exhortation is arguably the only one contained in any ancient creed forcing the powerful to protect the lives of the vulnerable, even if means risking life and limb. It is the ultimate source for R2P, or Responsibility to Protect, the modern political doctrine that would force great powers to intervene in the face of genocide. Whereas the Christian Bible says to turn the other cheek and love your enemies, the Jewish Bible forces us to fight evil.

On May 21, our organization, The World Values Network, held its fifth annual Champions of Jewish Values Awards Gala, at New York City’s Cipriani. For an organization like ours, which is committed to commemorating past genocides and preventing those of the future, the past year has been one of the most crucial and meaningful in recent memory.

Just a month after our last gala, on July 2, 2016, the twenty-sixth of the Hebrew month of Sivan, the world would bear the loss of its chief moral authority, Elie Wiesel, the man whom president Barack Obama called “the conscience of the world.” One of the most respected men on earth, Wiesel’s very name has come to bear the weight of all of the most fundamental values of the Jewish people: those of faith and of struggle, of strength and of pride, of righteous indignation and of the courage to forgive. He was, and remains, an eternal beacon of wisdom for us and our children and an essential element in the moral bedrock of the world.

Elie’s absence was felt most with the disintegration of Aleppo, Syria in December of last year. As barrel bombs fell on children, there was no voice that could shame the Western powers into taking action. Indeed, the government of the United States passed a United Nations Security Council Resolution condemning Israeli settlements, while failing to pass single resolution condemning the mass murder in Syria.

Our dinner this year was dedicated to the memory of Prof. Wiesel, commemorating his incredible life’s work. It was held exactly 11 Hebrew months after his death, which, according to Jewish tradition, is the last day on which we recite the Kaddish prayer for the deceased. Wiesel’s only son, Elisha, who attended with his mother, Marion, as the evening’s keynote speaker, recited the prayer.

We chose the date of the gala to coincide with the world’s most famous Holocaust survivor’s last Kaddish as a poignant reminder of the everlasting memory Reb Eliezer, as I affectionately called him, lent the six million victims of the Germans who had no Kaddish said for them.

Last month I visited Auschwitz as part of the March of the Living. Elisha spoke beautifully there to 12,000 Jewish youth from around the world about this father’s legacy and what it means for us today. He spoke of the Jewish community standing against gay men and women being slaughtered in Muslim lands and the need for America to take in refugees from Syria. It was a courageous and unforgettable speech wherein Elisha continued his father’s defining virtue of speaking truth to power.

The Trump administration gained tremendous moral authority when it punished Assad for using chemical weapons in Syria. It can gain so much more by welcoming refugees from war-ravaged nations, especially Syria, even amid our legitimate need to keep America safe.

Reb Eliezer dedicated his life to commemorating the victims of mankind’s greatest crime, ensuring that it never be lost to the public consciousness.

Unlike many survivors, who could not bear to face the horrors of their past, in his writing of Night Wiesel decided to relive every horrid moment of his years in Auschwitz so that the world might know what befell the Jews of Europe, captured as it was from his own perspective.

However, his life was not dedicated only to memory, but to action, too. Publishing over 40 books in his lifetime, Wiesel’s works and ideas would launch him to the global fore. Once he’d achieved such influence, he would commit himself to doing all he could to protect innocent life. Winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, Elie Wiesel would use his renown and influence to enshrine the memory of those for whom help never came and protect those for whom it still could.

It was Elie Wiesel who pushed president Carter to commission the US Holocaust Museum, admonished president Reagan for speaking at the cemetery in Bitburg that contained SS graves, who called upon president Clinton to protect those being slaughtered in Kosovo and the Balkans, and asked him the piercing question of why America did nothing while yet another genocide was taking place in Rwanda.

It is fitting therefore that at a night dedicated to the memory of history’s greatest witness to genocide, we hosted President Paul Kagame of Rwanda, whose courageous actions in 1994 ended the slaughter that saw nearly one million of his countrymen brutally hacked to death with machetes.

Which brings us to our world today.

In the past year, the world has watched the slaughter in Syria turn into what can be described as nothing short of genocide, as Hezbollah, Iran and Alawite militias have targeted Sunnis for destruction. In Bashar Assad’s December Aleppo offensive, his armies murdered at least a thousand civilians. The offensive brought the death toll of the six-year conflict horrifyingly close to the half-million mark. Then, just over a month ago, Assad took a note from the Nazis and once again employed poison gas against civilians.

I believe that every Jew must be committed to fighting genocide and the World Values Network is dedicated to international media campaigns highlighting the evils of mass murder. Whether it was our endless campaigning against the Iranian mullahs, who threaten Israel constantly with yet another genocide of the Jews, or our push for presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump to take action in Syria, defending the infinite value of every human life is at the top of our agenda. At our gala this year, though, we took things to a new level with the announcement, God willing, of a permanent Anti-Genocide Center.

With a fusion of aggressive lobbying, sweeping media campaigns and on-the-ground activities, the Anti-Genocide Center will work to ensure that the world hears the voices of those facing the horrifying prospect of wholesale slaughter. With headquarters in the world’s diplomatic capital in New York, the center will have satellite offices in both Jerusalem and Kigali, Rwanda, each focusing on peoples at risk in the Middle East and Africa, respectively.

The locale of these offices is key. This initiative will, God willing, bind together Jerusalem and Kigali in the mutual mission of ensuring that the horrors that befell our peoples never again be allowed to pass anywhere across the globe.

We also dedicated a Torah scroll to the memory of Elie Wiesel and the victims of the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide.

There could be no better time to recognize those who fight for Israel, with our Gala being held just two days before Yom Yerushalayim and the fiftieth anniversary of the reunification of Israel’s eternal capital.


Syria’s crematoriums echo the Holocaust — President Trump, bomb them now

The most important human rights story of the week seems to have been largely overshadowed by political headlines. The report that should consume the international community is the revelation that U.S. satellite photos have identified crematoria at Syrian President Bashar Assad’s Sednaya prison. Assad built these killing centers to destroy the evidence of his mass murder of innocent civilians and political opponents in Syria, amid a growing genocide.

Just over 70 years ago, the United States failed to bomb the Auschwitzextermination camp and other death camps, allowing the Nazis to continue to murder millions of Jews with impunity. If the phrase “Never again” is to have any meaning, the United States, Israel, or some other power that stands for morality and against the evils of genocide, must immediately bomb the Syrian crematoria.

On Sunday night, a tribute will be held in New York City in honor of Elie Wiesel at the World Values Network Gala, of which I am founder. After surviving the concentration camps, Wiesel devoted his life to doing everything in his power to ensure that nothing like the Holocaust would ever happen again. If he were alive, he would be demanding action from the world’s leaders. He would not be silent just because the rest of the world is mired today in moral ambiguity. He would be horrified that the pages of major newspapers around the world published pictures of crematoria taking place before our eyes and the world did nothing.

With Wiesel’s death last year, the responsibility to stop innocent Arab men, women, and children from being slaughtered in Syria falls to all of us.

I accompanied Elie’s son, Elisha, to his recent “March of the Living Speech” at Auschwitz, where he electrified the audience with a demand that we finally become our brother’s keeper. Twelve thousand young Jews walked down the same paths of those whose lives were extinguished, whose bodies and souls were burned in crematoria and remains floated to heaven.

Today, we know many of these Jews could have been saved had the president of the United States bombed the camp, or at least the train tracks leading to Auschwitz. It was not a complicated operation — the Allies were already bombing targets in the area. Nevertheless, for reasons that remain as unacceptable today as they were then, Franklin Roosevelt refused to act, knowing the deadly consequences of his inaction.

For many years the Roosevelt administration pretended not to be aware of the “Final Solution” to the “Jewish problem.” The president knew Hitler’s intent as early as 1939, and he knew the Nazis were engaged in mass murder, but saving the Jewish people was never his priority.


Roosevelt was one of our greatest presidents, and he ultimately defeated Hitler. But his legacy will forever be tarnished by his failure to do more to prevent the destruction of European Jewry. His failure on Auschwitz is Exhibit A.

Now there is no pretense, no question about what we know. We see pure evil before our eyes.

Hitler was emboldened by the world’s failure to act after the Nuremberg laws were enacted, after Kristallnacht foreshadowed the fate of European Jewry, after Hitler’s explicit declaration of his intent to exterminate the Jews, and after learning of the Final Solution.

Barack Obama did nothing while Assad terrorized and used chemical weapons on his people. Worse, Obama’s failure to enforce his “red line”emboldened Assad to gas his people again. Recently, the former president bizarrely and brazenly claimed that his inaction in Syria required “political courage,” as if a failure to punish the gassing of children is something merits applause.

Now, a failure to destroy the crematoria in Syria will give Assad an international license to continue to slaughter his people and destroy the evidence in puffs of smoke.

President Trump will be in Israel in a few days and visit Yad Vashem, the museum and memorial to the 6 million Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust. Just 150 miles away, Syria is running a killing center that is a reminder of the adage that those who do not learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them.

To his credit, Donald Trump took decisive action in response to Assad’s last chemical attack. It was his proudest moment as president. Now, he must be equally decisive by sending cruise missiles or whatever munitions are required to reduce the crematoria to rubble.

It is unconscionable to allow Assad to get away with his continuing war crimes. He must be charged in the International Court of Justice with crimes against humanity.

Every nation must speak out against this evil. More important, each must contribute to putting a stop to Assad’s killing spree — starting with the destruction of his crematoria.


No, Assad is not good for Israel, and he never will be

By far the most shocking thing I heard at the Jerusalem Post conference in New York was former Israel Defense Forces chief of staff Dan Halutz saying that Bashar Assad was good for Israel, because Assad keeps the peace in Syria and a modicum of stability.

Expect that he doesn’t. Syria is a mess of death and destruction.

Even if Assad did keep the peace in Syria, he would never be good for Israel.

The Jewish state is fundamentally different, founded as it is on a dream — a vision of a nation emerging from the cauldron of Auschwitz, an ancient homeland resurrected following eviction from another brutal power, Rome, 2,000 years ago. The Jews are survivors of genocide, and above all else they cherish life. That’s why Israel mourns its dead soldiers perhaps more than any nation on earth.

This past Shabbat, my family and I hosted Aviram Shaul, brother of Oron Shaul, an IDF soldier who was murdered by Hamas in July 2014 in Gaza. Hamas kidnapped his body and is holding it as ransom until today. His family is suffering terribly.

Israel is trying everything to recover his body, because to the Israeli people, its boys must always come home. Sitting with Shaul and with his IDF escort, who helps run the unit that deals with Israel’s 170 MIA families, was painful, but also an inspiration.

I thought of this as I listened to the former IDF head telling a New York City crowd two days later that Israel should support Assad. Halutz has a moral obligation to retract his words. Genocide is the world’s foremost abomination. Assad is guilty of using poison gas against innocent Arab men, women and children. His foremost critics should be not Arabs but Jews. For no one knows better than us what murder by poison gas is like.

In the Torah, we read in Leviticus 19, “Do not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor.” This is the biblical basis for the responsibility to protect, the moral imperative imposed on the powerful to protect the weak.

In the White House a few years ago I studied this passage, along with its commentaries, with Samantha Power before she became America’s ambassador to the United Nations. Samantha had earned a global reputation fighting genocide, only to see it undermined by the Obama administration’s refusal to take action against Assad, once he began gassing his people in August of 2013. Her name has been forever compromised by Syria, just as Donald Trump’s name was greatly enhanced through his decisive action against Assad once the butcher decided to gas his people again.

Israel must be on the right side of history. Choosing the political stability of a neighbor while its people are massacred is not something the Jewish state can countenance. Israel should be calling loudly for an end to Assad’s atrocities against his people.

Yes, ISIS is a real danger, and yes, Assad might serve as a bulwark against it. But not at the price of gassing children.

I’m surprised that an IDF chief of staff doesn’t understand this. Israel is strong primarily because it has morality on its side, which is what brings people of goodwill throughout the world to its defense. It can never lose the moral argument.

Yes, Israel is loathed by a great many around the world. But compare them to the 80 million born-again American Christians whose support for Israel is stalwart. And this is precisely because Israel is the realization of a biblical dream of justice and righteousness.

Just imagine how we Jews would have reacted if Halutz were speaking 70 years earlier as the head of the American military, telling us that stopping Hitler’s slaughter of the Jews is subordinate to the overarching war aims of defeating the Third Reich. Our response would be, “Are you kidding? You can’t at least bomb the train tracks to Auschwitz, where 10,000 people are gassed every day? And if you can’t, are you still moral?”

FDR has a claim to being the greatest president of the 20th century because it was he who defeated Hitler. But his legacy will be forever stained, even among progressives, by his refusal to take decisive action to stop the Holocaust.

I recognize that Israel’s options in Syria are limited. Any action the Jewish state takes against Assad will be interpreted by many in the Arab world as an aggressive rather than a compassionate action. But I also understand that Israel’s voice is still robust.

No senior IDF officer should be on the wrong side of history.

Halutz should reconsider his words and publicly repudiate such misguided sentiments.

On May 21 our organization will be hosting a tribute to Elie Wiesel at Cipriani in New York City. It will feature his son Elisha delivering a keynote address. In attendance will be President Paul Kagame of Rwanda and some of Israel’s leading diplomats. We will focus on the human responsibility to oppose genocide. No doubt Syria will be on everyone’s mind.


Never again? The Holocaust can happen again — and it’s up to us to stop it

Since my recent return from March of the Living at Auschwitz, I’ve written a series of articles on both my experiences at the death camp and the harrowing mental processing that’s followed. When you visit a place like Birkenau, where the very earth you walk on is soaked in the blood of innocent men, women and children, there is simply no limit to the pain, loss, and righteous indignation one can feel for their deaths.

But there’s another side to the equation. There weren’t just victims at the death camps — there were perpetrators, too. Who were these people? How could they have done this? What brand of brutal inhumanity could ever possess a man so deeply that he could herd droves of children into a furnace?

Were they monsters?

Well, if you’d been reading the signs at Auschwitz-Birkenau or almost any other concentration camp, you may be led to believe they were: a special brand of beasts known as Nazis.

There is almost no mention at the camps of where these Nazis came from, what they believed, or what they were fighting for. They might as well have arrived from another planet. One would, in all likelihood, find no evidence that these men had anything to do with a Western-European state called Germany. That they came from Germany, believed in Germany, fought for Germany, and killed for Germany.

In my humble opinion, that’s a problem.

The truth is, these men weren’t monsters. They were ordinary people, just like me and you. They had families, girlfriends, pets and gardens they’d tend to. Hitler himself was known for the warmth and love he felt for his dog, Blondi. Many of those who perpetrated the holocaust were not just professional killers — they had advanced degrees in such areas as agriculture and the humanities.

Ludolf von Alvensleben, one of the SS leaders in Poland and Crimea, had a degree in agronomy, for example, and spent his years after the war overseeing fisheries in Argentina (no, he was never brought to justice.) Hans-Adolf Prützmann likewise earned a degree in agriculture just a few years before he would oversee the Einsatzgruppen detachments that perpetrated the Holocaust in the Baltic States. Paul Blobel, who murdered over 33,000 Jews in the forest of Babi Yar and commissioned the first gas vans, was a trained architect and spent nearly a decade in that profession. Richard Baer, who ran Auschwitz in the last year of the war, was a trained confectioner. Yes, one of the men who ran the world’s largest factories of death originally made sweets for a living.

The Nazis were not monsters at all. They were in fact people who believed so deeply in the superiority of Germany and its godlike Fuhrer that they’d kill 6 million innocent people to advance their national cause.

Twice in 1932, the German people elected the Nazis as the largest party in the Reichstag, and in 1933, the Nazis got 43.9 percent of the popular vote — making the Nazis Germany’s most popular party by far.

Then, in 1933, the parliament voted to allow the Deutschnationale Coalition to govern without the consent of parliament members. The law itself was unconstitutional, but it was passed with such an overwhelming majority — a majority large enough to change the constitution — that the democratically elected parliament didn’t even bother taking the step to legalize their measures.

Following the death of President Hindenburg in August 1934, Hitler gave the German people a referendum whereby they would approve his assumption of supreme power. Here, over 88 percent of the population voted for the Fürher.

Finally, in the German and Election Referendum of 1936, 98.8 percent of the German population voted in support of Hitler, a level of popularity unparalleled in history. This election, I must mention, took place just after the passage of the notorious Nuremberg Laws, which stripped all Jews and other non-Germans of all rights.

Sure, Hitler didn’t campaign on promises of a Holocaust, but as the Nuremberg Laws had shown, his outspoken hatred of the Jews and his willingness to act upon his virulent anti-Semitism was abundantly clear. Worst of all, once Hitler did begin to perpetrate unprecedented atrocities, the German people, by and large, stood fervently by his side.

According to historian Ian Kershaw, German popular support for Hitler reached its peak when he returned from his tour of the newly conquered Paris in July of 1940. By this time, the Einsatzgruppen had already begun their campaigns of systematic murder throughout Poland. Over 95,000 Jews had been deported as part of the Nisko Plan. Concentration camps were up and running. And Reinhard Heydrich had begun to hole up all of Poland’s Jews in the squalor of the ghettos, where thousands died from maltreatment, disease, starvation and exhaustion.

So let’s say it as it is: the Holocaust wasn’t a crime perpetrated by just the Nazis, a political party, but one supported and therefore committed by the German people as a collective.

This is not to say that Germans today are culpable for the actions of their forbearers. Judaism has never preached vertical accountability, where children must bear the guilt of their ancestors (18 Ezekiel says most emphatically they do not). But what we do demand is horizontal accountability, where if an entire nation elects, supports and executes the orders of a murderous government like that of the Nazis — especially when they do so enthusiastically — then they must own the crime.

If there’s any reason we must remember the Holocaust, aside from its own sake, it’s so that we never allow it to happen again. To do that, we have to foresee potential mass killings before they start. And if we have any hope of achieving that critical goal, we need to understand that mass murderers like the Nazis can rise up at any place and at any time.

It is for this reason that our organization, The World Values Network, plans to announce, at our May 21 Gala in New York City honoring the memory of our friend Elie Wiesel, and in the presence of Rwandan President Paul Kagame, the creation of a global anti-Genocide initiative with offices in New York, Jerusalem, and Kigali, Rwanda.

As I walked through Auschwitz and saw that all the signs said “Nazi” without mention of the word “Germany,” I felt like I was being subjected to historical revisionism of the worst kind. I felt like museum curators were inadvertently trying to load the blame of the Holocaust upon a foreign screed of devils who somehow made it onto earth. That they were a historical fluke, an exception to humanity’s rule, some sort of once-in-a-historical-lifetime aberration.

But they weren’t. They were people. And people today can become whatever it is that they choose to become. Yes, Bashar Assad can embrace the ideology of the mass murder that we associate with the Nazis — as the death toll in his country nears the half-million mark, he’s well on his way. The mullahs in Iran, threatening as they are to raze Israel to the ground and wipe it off the map, are using 1940s Germany as their model.

Perpetrators of genocide can and will rise so long as we fail to see them. So long as we dissociate the crimes of the Nazis from the nation of Germany, we push the concept of genocide one step further away from our collective consciousness and out of our world. In a world, however, where mass killing and the threat thereof is a regular reality, our awareness of genocide needs to be right here with us always, down to- earth and firmly set within our minds.



The moral of the story is that not every dispute in Chabad is about pure ideology.

Twenty-three years ago, I was forced to resign as Chabad rabbi to the Jewish students at Oxford University. The reason: I had some 5,000 non-Jewish student members of our organization,


Rabbi Shmuley: We Do Not Forget — President Trump Promised Jerusalem

This Sunday, I will be flying to Israel immediately after the gala dinner of our organization, the World Values Network. I am going to attend the 50th anniversary of Jerusalem Day, when Israel reunified Jerusalem in the 1967 war, affirming the Jewish people’s rebirth in their ancient capital after the devastation of the Holocaust.

President Donald Trump will be there, too. During his campaign, he made a commitment to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and move the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv.

In addition, the Republican Party platform at last year’s convention said: “We recognize Jerusalem as the eternal and indivisible capital of the Jewish state, and call for the American embassy to be moved there in fulfillment of U.S. law.”

President Trump is being pressured from many sides to renege on that pledge. But he must resist the naysayers and do what he knows in his mind and heart to be the right thing for America and for our foremost ally, Israel.

Barack Obama did good things for the Jewish state, including stepping up military and economic cooperation, as Israel repeatedly acknowledged. There was little good, however, about his policies of paying ransom to the genocidal Iranian regime,;or providing funding to the Palestinian Authority so it can pay salaries to terrorists; or doing nothing after Syria’s tyrant gassed his people.

President Trump did the right thing in attacking the Syrian tyrant following the latest chemical weapons attack, in telling Mahmoud Abbas he must stop paying terrorists, and in denouncing the catastrophic nuclear deal with Iran. But more must be done — and the Jerusalem Embassy move is especially long overdue.

It is outrageous that out of the 190 nations America has diplomatic relations with, Israel is the only one whose capital is not recognized by the U.S. government.

More than 20 years ago, in 1990, Congress passed a resolution declaring that “Jerusalem is and should remain the capital of the State of Israel” and “must remain an undivided city in which the rights of every ethnic and religious group are protected.” Five years later, Congress overwhelmingly passed legislation reiterating that position and requiring the U.S. embassy in Israel to be moved no later than May 1999. The Jerusalem Embassy Act passed the Senate by 93-5. The most famous Democratic Senators of the time all voted for it, including Senators Joe Biden (D-DE), John Kerry (D-MA), Harry Reid (D-NV), and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).

It is now May 2017, and the embassy remains in Tel Aviv. Trump’s predecessors, despite pledging during their campaigns to move the embassy, repeatedly signed waivers that allowed them to ignore the legislation on grounds that delaying would be in the national security interests of the United States. Trump is now being asked to sign a similar waiver to frustrate the will of Congress and to break a central campaign promise, once again.

He is being told the embassy cannot be moved because it might provoke outrage in the Muslim world and violence in Jerusalem. That is blackmail and the United States cannot give in to such threats. We cannot allow others to dictate what should and should not be sovereign U.S. territory. And no one should be making threats to the most powerful and righteous nation on earth without assuming there will be serious consequences.

Furthermore, the Muslim world should not be treated with such disrespect. We should not take the paternalistic view that Muslims cannot understand that Jerusalem has long been Israel’s capital and that the United States is the Jewish state’s closest ally. Reinforcing our special relationship by moving a building should not be seen as a provocation or retreat from our friendship with Arab and Muslim nations.

Furthermore, Muslims in the Middle East have far more serious concerns that, unlike U.S. policy toward Jerusalem, directly affect their lives. They suffer deprivations and persecution in many of their own countries. Shiites and Sunnis are at war throughout the region. Iran is threatening the well-being of Muslims throughout the area as well as the leaders of several Arab countries. Muslims are dying daily in fighting in Iraq, Yemen, and Syria. Will all of these problems evaporate with the relocation of our embassy? Will the ongoing conflicts stop so Muslims can redirect their anger toward the United States and Israel?

Radical Islamists want to destroy our way of life and nothing we do – or don’t do – will change their agenda. Furthermore, the best way to prevent violence is to show we will not give in to threats, and to send a clear message to the provocateurs in the Palestinian Authority and elsewhere that we will not tolerate any actions on their part to incite violence.

Moreover, moving our embassy will not harm the peace process. The opposite is true. By making clear the United States position that Jerusalem should remain unified under Israeli sovereignty, unrealistic Palestinian expectations regarding the city can be moderated, and thereby enhance the prospects for a final agreement.

Despite the outrageously biased UN Resolution 2334, supported by Trump’s predecessor, Israel will not compromise its sovereignty over its capital. It will never give up Judaism’s holy places. It will not allow the Palestinian Authority or its supporters at UNESCO to erase the history of the Jewish people from their homeland.

There is no better time than President Trump’s upcoming visit to Jerusalem to declare that, a he promised during the campaign, he will move the U.S. embassy to Israel’s eternal capital. Doing so will help him domestically by demonstrating that he is indeed a man of his word. It will help him internationally by showing that he cannot be intimidated by threats. It will advance  his interest in peace by sending a message to the Palestinians that he stands by Israel and will not capitulate to their demands or force Israel to do so. Showing his commitment to Jerusalem will also restore the confidence of the people of Israel that the United States has their back. Finally, standing up for American values and correcting a historical wrong will be a part of his presidential legacy, which will earn him the gratitude of the Jewish people and the respect of all Americans.

Last month, on Holocaust Memorial Day, President Trump spoke movingly about the memory of the six million Jews murdered in the Second World War. He praised genocide’s foremost witness, Elie Wiesel, as “a great man” whose “absence leaves an empty space in our hearts, but his spirit fills this room.”

This Sunday, at the World Values Network gala, Professor Wiesel’s son, Elisha, will be reciting the very last Kaddish — the Jewish prayer for the dead — for his father. Immediately after that, I will leave for Israel.

We Jews do not forget. We have mourned the destruction of Jerusalem for thousands of years. President Trump has a unique opportunity to turn that mourning into the joy of celebration when he, too, arrives in Israel. He can, at a unique moment in history, move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and confirm its permanence as Israel’s capital.

It is an opportunity he must not decline.